Amazon Follows Suit

As Daron Fraley pointed out in the comments section of my last post, Amazon has already dropped the price on the Kindle to $189. That’s a step in the right direction, but I’m still waiting to see what happens as we near the holidays. At $189 I’ll buy it at Christmas. $99 and I’d buy it tomorrow. We’ll see what happens in the long run.

Posted in Industry News, kindle | 1 Comment

Nook Drops Price

Looks like competition is bringing down prices. Barnes & Noble has dropped the price on the Nook, their answer to Amazon’s Kindle. You can buy the basic version for $149, and their Wi/Fi enabled version for $199, roughly $60 less than the Kindle.

No word from Amazon if they are considering a similar move, although with pressure now from both the iPad, as well as Nook, it may not be long.

Posted in Industry News, Nook | 1 Comment

Win Win

Let’s talk a little about the price of books. Let’s say you just wrote a new novel, and you set the price at $10 per copy. At that price you will likely sell 10,000 books. Gross income will be $100,000. Now let’s say you raise the price to $20 per unit. Because of the higher price, maybe now you only sell 8,000 copies for a gross income of $160,000. This is good because not only do you make more money, but you don’t have to print, package, and ship as many books.

Ultimate, however, you reach a point where by raising the price you no longer get more money. For example, let’s say you raise the price of each book to $30, but now you only sell 5,000 copies, for a gross income of $150,000. In our simple example, it’s clear $20 is a good price per unit.

The reason I use this simplified example is to illustrate the idea that the more something costs, the less you will sell. Conversely if you lower the price, you’ll sell more. There are exceptions, but this is the general rule.

As a new author, you will likely sign a contract in which you will earn 5-10 percent for each print book sold. So let’s say you make 7.5% on a $12.50 book. Somebody check my math, but as an author you’ll be making roughly 88 cents per book.

Now let’s see how an author fares on the e-book model. Amazon pays 70% to authors. On a $12.50 book you’ll earn $8.75. But here is the kicker. You could lower the price to $2.99 and you’d still be making $2.10. At the lower price, you’ll likely sell more books, but you’re still making more than the 88 cents you’d make on a physical book.

Another added benefit is that once you’ve got the digital copy of your book online, you don’t have to worry about printing books, storing them, packaging them, and shipping them. You can sell 5 books as easy as you can sell 5 million. It makes sense to drop the price to where you’ll sell more books.

Does this mean publishers are pretty much worthless in this new model? Do they go extinct? No, but it does mean they have to adapt. There are several key things they must do in order to provide value to the process, and I may or may not talk about what those things are in a later post.

Posted in digital revolution, e-books | 1 Comment

E-books for Young Readers?

Random House just announced that they will be releasing all 6,234 books in the Magic Tree House series in e-book format. I’m interested in this for several reasons. First, I love to see the e-books movement progress in any shape or form. The more e-books we have, the more e-book readers will be bought, thus driving the sales of e-books, and benefiting authors and readers everywhere.

The second reason I’m interested in this move is because I write for the Middle Grade audience. I’d love to release my book in the e-book format but I have to wonder how many ten-year olds out there own a Kindle? Or how many of them have parents who are willing to let them borrow their e-reader? For selfish reasons I hope to the Magic Tree House eBooks do well. It means that I might very well have a market.

Posted in digital revolution, e-books, Industry News | 1 Comment

E-Books released first?

Random House is releasing the e-book version of one of their books before the print version. While I’m sure this has been done before, it’s nice to see one of the larger publishing companies try it out. Many of the big houses have been doing just the opposite–holding back the eBook until months after the hard cover release (clinging to the old model).

I’m interested to see the results of such a move. There are two trains of thought around such a strategy. One is that people will buy the e-book first, meaning they have no need to buy the hardcover. People who hold to this notion argue eBook negatively affect sales.

The second train of thought is e-books sales will act as a type of marketing for the book. The eBook will generate a healthy buzz which will positively affect sales.

As a fan of the Open Model (which I still haven’t discussed on this blog, but promise to very soon), I fall in the latter camp. I believe as long as the book is good, getting an electronic version out early can help the sales of the print version.

Posted in e-books, Industry News | 1 Comment

Some Folks Get It

I try to keep abreast of the many author, agent, and publisher blogs out there that talk about new models in publishing, but I just don’t have as much time as I’d like. Which is why I appreciate it when friends send me links because they know of my interest in openness and publishing. One person who has done this faithfully for years is Jaime Theler. You can read her fantastic blog here.

The other day Jaime sent me a link to Nathan Bransford’s blog. I’ve been aware of Bransfords blog for a while, but don’t follow it every day. However, the link Jaime sent me shows that Bransford is in the camp of industry professionals who get it. From his post:

“The lack of commercial viability of 99% of the books written every year necessitates all this rejection. I can only take on the books I think I can sell to publishers, and aspiring authors receive this judgment in the form of a rejection letter. But the very nature of commercial viability in the publishing world is changing quickly with the transition to e-books, and I think it’s ultimately a change for the better.”

The key phrase in Branford’s post is the bit about the changing commercial viability. You see, no matter what agents and publishers tell you, they aren’t in the business of printing good books, they are in the business of making money. It’s a happy coincidence that usually it takes good books to make money, but not always. And sometimes good books can’t make enough money to cover the expenses. Those good books never make it into readers hands, unfortunately. But with e-books, all that changes.

Under the new model, an author can pay a few grand to get a book edited, formatted, and pay for cover work, ISBN, etc. Instead of having to sell thousands of $25 hardback books to be commercially viable, they can sell a few thousand books priced at $3. A book is ‘good, but unmarketable’, can now see the light of day. Both readers and authors should rejoice.

Continuing from Bransford’s post:

“Clay Shirky, author of HERE COMES EVERYBODY, notes that we’re moving from an era where we filtered and then published to one where we’ll publish and then filter. And no one would be happier than me to hand the filtering reins over to the reading public, who will surely be better at judging which books should rise to the top than the best guesses of a handful of publishing professionals.”

I think that very soon we’ll no longer see authors sending manuscripts to agents and publishers hoping for that 1 in a thousand acceptance letter. Instead, agents and publishers (if they’re smart) will be combing Amazon, iBooks, and Smashwords, looking for what is selling. Authors will post their books online and then one day, out of the blue, they’ll get an e-mail from somebody in the industry who says something like, “Hey, we noticed your book is selling well. We’ve read it, it’s in good shape, and we’d like to print it.” The clear benefit is that the author will be in the driver’s seat, not the other way around.

The internet is the same way. As Bransford points out, nobody says, “You know what’s wrong with the internet…too many pages.” The more pages and books the merrier. The good stuff will bubble up, and those who really have the talent will find their way to a traditional publisher.

Posted in digital revolution, e-books, Industry News, Open | Leave a comment

A Coming Golden Age?

Pipe Dreams

Okay, in my last post I said people who make predictions aren’t that bright. And then I go and write a post with the title ‘Coming Golden Age’? Am I crazy?  No, because if you add a question mark after a prediction, you’re just posing a query, not telling the future, right?

I got to thinking about Scott Adams dire prediction that the profession of authors will be retired in his lifetime. I wrote a rebuttal but the more I’ve thought about it the more I wonder if digital technology won’t do just the opposite–open up a golden age in literature. This is in stark contrast to many who have claimed that e-books will in fact bring about the death of literature, but allow me to explain.

Dan Wells recently presented a lifetime achievement award to Dave Wolverton at the Whitney Awards. While doing so, Dan briefly told his life story which surprised me because it mirrored my own. He wanted to be an author since he was young. Public school all but beat that dream out of him, but when he got to college, Dave Wolverton told him he could fulfill his dream. It would take work, but it could be done. Dan studied the craft, worked hard, and is now an accomplished author.

Where our stories differ is that my professor in college told me that it wasn’t possible to make money at writing, at least not as an author. He informed our class that the odds of making a living writing were a million to one, but that if we loved the craft we should go into technical writing instead. I didn’t want to be a technical writer, and so I gave up the dream and went the more practical route of choosing a career in technology and education. Even to this day I cannot find time to study the craft like I could have back in college, and I lost years of writing because of this poor decision.

But as we move into the realm of e-books, we’re going to see more and more authors being able to make a comfortable living at writing. Twenty years ago things did look pretty bleak. You had a handful of superstars raking in millions of dollars, and then a good number of authors who were barely scratching out a living, many of them having to work a ‘day job’ to support their writing habits.

Enter the digital era. If e-books pan out like many are predicting, students in college will be told, “Hey, you may not be able to make ten million a year like the authors of yesteryear, but if you’re good you can make a comfortable living.” Would-be authors will see their dream as a viable profession, not one of a starving artist. We’ll have more students studying the craft, more students delivering their work via the new digital models, and more choices when we go to the digital bookstore in the cloud. We’ll see more and better work, not less.

So to all you English majors out there wondering if you should be chase after your dream, or choose the more practical route, I’m happy to tell you, now you can do both.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Missing the Mark

Ok, we’ve established the publishing industry is going through significant changes right now. People everywhere are predicting what things will look like in three to five years.

The future is hard to predict, but this article over at the Huffington Post so completely misses the mark I honestly wondered if it was satire. From the article:

“The book-buying habits sustaining [mid-list authors’] work may become a thing of the past when printed books are swapped for digital ones. As strolling and perusing the aisles of a bookstore is replaced with a mouse and computer screen, the demise of brick-and-mortar retailers will accelerate and critically important links between midlist authors and their readers will be severed.”

Right. Because if there is one thing we know the internet has a problem with, it’s creating links between people and things. The internet is all about putting people in a silo. /sarcasm

Again, from the article:

“As of yet, there is no digital substitute to this serendipitous manner of bringing readers and writers together. Furthermore an important symbiotic relationship between best-selling authors and their lesser brethren will end. Readers who buy new books by Dan Brown or Kitty Kelley frequently leave the store with another title under their arm. But it is often the invitingly deep and varied inventory of books by midlist authors that lure the reader into the store in the first place.”

No digital substitue? Has the author never bought a book on Amazon? Has the author never looked up a book on Amazon? Because as soon as  you do, you’re bombarded with ‘you may like this’ suggestions. The authors suggests that when you go to a store, the clerk might recommend a good book. Online you can read the opinions of thousands of other readers, not just the clerk who may or may not have the same tastes as you. It’s like shopping with a crowd of experts.

Compare this to other industries that have gone through the same digital growing pains.

Newspapers -Imagine ten years ago predicting big newspapers and magazines growing bigger, and smaller voices (blogs, e-zines, sites like Huffington Post) going the way of the dinosaur.

Or what about music? Have the big names gotten bigger, and the ‘midlisters’ dissapeared? Hardly. Just the opposite. Talented musicians have been able to go straight to fans and find a larger audience. They’ve been able to do much better under the digital model than ever before. Just ask musicians like Jonathan Coultan.

I don’t like to predict because I don’t know the industry as well as the insiders. However, I feel very comfortable saying that mid-list authors will in fact NOT suffer in the coming e-book revolution. In fact, we’ll see the opposite. We’ll see fewer ‘rock stars’ in publishing, and more and more good authors finding an audience because they can directly connect with fans.

Joe Konrath is often called a ‘mid-list’ author. You don’t have to read very far down his blog to see how he is faring under this new model.

Posted in digital revolution, e-books | 3 Comments

How does the Kindle respond to the iPad?

Good article on the iPad and Kindle over on Seth Godin’s blog. He presents an interesting strategy for Amazon/Kindle, and it’s close to the open model I’ve talked about on this blog. His idea–Give the Kindle away at a rock bottom price, and then make money selling books.

This strategy has been used for years in the video game industry. Sell the X-box at a loss, then make money on the games. Seth suggests selling the Kindle for $49. Or better yet, buy ten books, get a Kindle free. You might lose money on the hardward, but you’d open yourself up to millions of users looking to buy books.

I have to admit, I’m getting more tempted to buy a Kindle. I’ll likely get one for Christmas. But if Kindle put the price at $49, I’d buy one tomorrow. Heck, I’d buy one right now. And you can bet I’d start buying more books.

Competition is good. Let’s hope Amazon stays in the game.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Pyr Books

Lou Anders from Pyr books recently commented on my Part of the Problem post, and clarifies what he meant by his Tweets. I didn’t want his response to get lost in the comment section so I’m reprinting them here as a post.

“With respect, you have taken my words out of context, and left out a good many tweets between and after these two. I was trying to express frustration with a certain type of query letter, as best I could in 140 characters. There is a certain, regularly occurring type of query that begins with sentences like “if you are like me, you find all science fiction books poorly written, with cardboard characters, which is why you will love my client’s work, as he/she can actually write real people” or “if you are like me, you find all fantasy works childish, which is why you will really enjoy this manuscript, which is better than everything out there.” Elaine Cunningham expressed what I was trying to say better than I did, when she said this was code for something like “This manuscript is better than my impressions of the stereotypes of fantasy, which I don’t actually read myself.”

“The tweet wasn’t meant for readers, but addressed at agents, and what I was trying to say was that we already have an incredibly rich and diverse SF&F field, that encompasses everyone from Samuel Delaney to Charlaine Harris, from Gene Wolf to Robert Jordan, from Jonathan Carroll to Patricia Briggs. It’s an incredibly diverse field, with a great many different works, of all levels of literary sophistication, shoved in the same bookstore category. To say “this is unlike everything that has come before” is to betray an ignorance of what has come before. I find it insulting to the scope and breadth of the existing field, insulting to readers (who presumable like reading the books they choose previous to this), and insulting to publishers (who, obviously, have published quite a lot before this submission).

“One of my authors, Martin Sketchley, said that there is nothing wrong with saying “this is a new and interesting spin on genre” but that too often the tone of these kinds of approaches is more like “this is a new and interesting spin on genre, and thank god, because everything before it has been such crap.”

“Query letters of this sort are invariably an indication that the agent isn’t well-versed in the field, and I was trying to alert agents that they might want to rethink this approach. It wasn’t a comment on the material at all, but on the fact that SF&F is an ongoing dialogue, one that builds upon the shoulders of everyone who has come before and is ever growing and evolving.

“When someone on twitter thought that it *was* a comment on the material, I quickly made the second statement above about the quality of our own line, which I stand behind. And, again with respect, I suspect that you haven’t checked out our line. I really defy anyone to read Michael Blumlein’s THE HEALER, or Keith Brooke’s GENETOPIA, or Robert Silverberg’s SON OF MAN, or Ian McDonald’s BRASYL, or Theodore Judson’s THE MARTIAN GENERAL’S DAUGHTER, or Kay Kenyon’s BRIGHT OF THE SKY, or Chris Roberson’s END OF THE CENTURY, or any number of other works, and come away thinking we are publishing the same old, same old.

“The thing is is that we are genre publishers, publishing genre books, for genre fans. You want to publish great genre books, not bad ones, and sometimes I think this field is embarrassed of itself, thinks “genre” is a dirty word. And it isn’t.

“But I do acknowledge that I did a poor job of cramming the above sentiment into the brevity of a tweet.”

I completely empathize with Mr. Anders on trying to get a point across in 140 characters or less. I also better understand his point–the frustration around agents who might characterize their clients books as ‘better than the normal drivel this genre sees’. I appreciate Mr. Anders taking the time to clarify his sentiment.

In a follow up comment, Mr. Anders also went on to say “I have a real problem with the “gatekeeper” theory of publishing – the argument that goes “all these good books would just come flooding in if only the agents and editors and publishers would just get out of the way.” Such arguments forget that everyone who works in publishing does so because they are lifelong book lovers. There are a thousand and one better ways to make money. We are in the business of books because we love good books and want to share them, same as anyone.”

I’ve posted my thoughts around gatekeepers before, and stand by them. However it sounds like Mr. Anders does not subscribe to the ‘we must stand as gatekeepers or literature will suffer‘ argument, instead possibly a ‘there is great writing out there, let’s shine the light on it’, argument, which I certainly commend. I’m not convinced all, or even most, publishers share this conviction.

So, long story short, it sounds like Lou Anders is passionate about good books in the Science Fiction/Fantasy genre, and if you happen to like that genre (as I do), I recommend checking out his site, and checking out his books.

Posted in Industry News | 2 Comments